2025:JHHC:31682 --1-- A.B.A. No. 4832 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4832 of 2025 ---- PPPPPPPPPPPPPPP .... Petitioner -- Versus -- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Informant/Complainant .... Opposite Parties ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Baban Prasad, Advocate For the State :- Mrs. Amrita Kumari, Advocate For the Informant :- Md. Faruque Ansari, Advocate ---- 07/14.10.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Daltonganj Town P.S. Case No.441 of 2024 for the alleged offences registered under Sections 323, 498A, 377 and 504 of Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palamau at Daltonganj. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the informant remained with the petitioner only for 20 days and thereafter she has left and there is delay in filing of the complaint case which has been sent for registration of F.I.R. to police under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. He then submits that only to make the case serious in nature such allegations are made. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer 2025:JHHC:31682 --2-- A.B.A. No. 4832 of 2025 and submits that in light of contents of the FIR the allegations are very serious. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the Informant also accepts the said submission of learned counsel appearing for the State. 6. Looking into the contents of the FIR it transpires that there are serious allegations against the petitioner of threatening dire consequences and threat used to do unnatural sex, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 14.10.2025 Sangam/