Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33521 (CHH)

SIKENDER SINGH DHILLON v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/2121/2025 · 2025-07-07

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:31335 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2121 of 2025 Sikender Singh Dhillon S/o Shri Jogender Singh Aged About 74 Years R/o House No. 14, Pyara Singh Colony, Rupnagar, Ropar, Rupnagar, Punjab ... Applicant versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Manendragarh, Earlier District Koriya, Present District Manendragarh Chirmiri Bharatpur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent For Petitioner : None For Respondent/State : Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 08.07.2025 1. This is an office reference. 2. This Court, vide order dated 07.11.2023, passed in MCRC No. 6760 of 2023, while allowing the bail to the petitioner, namely, Sikender Singh Dhillon, had expressed its trust that the trial Court should make an earnest endeavor to conclude the trial expeditiously in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order, if there was no legal impediment. RAJSHEKHAR SONI Digitally signed by RAJSHEKHAR SONI 2 3. Earlier on occasion also, this Court had granted extension of time for conclusion of the trial vide order dated 10.01.2025 in CRMP No.82/2025. 4. The learned Special Judge (Chhattisgarh Protection of Depositors Interest Act), Baikunthpur, District – Korea (C.G.) through the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Korea at Baikunthpur (C.G.) vide his request letter dated 26.06.2025 has requested for grant of 6 months’ time for concluding the trial. 5. It transpires from perusal of the PUD, that the present case is at the stage of recording of the prosecution witness, and a total of 22 witnesses have been examined and 10 witnesses are yet to be examined. Hence, trial is likely to take some time for its conclusion. Hence, he prays for grant of 6 months’ time for concluding the trial. 6. The request appears to be reasonable. The concerned trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as early as possible, preferably within a further period of six months from today. 7. Accordingly, this CRMP stands disposed off with the aforesaid direction. 8. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rajshekhar