LAADURAM S/O BHIKHARAM BISHNOI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/614/2025 · 2025-08-08
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3352 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3352 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:30686] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 614/2025 Laaduram S/o Bhikharam Bishnoi, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Gorkha Ki Dhani, Dantiwas, Police Station Bhinmal, District Jalore (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gajveer Singh Rajawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 08/08/2025
1. This instant application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicant-accused Laaduram S/o Bhikharam Bishnoi in FIR No. 78/2024 dated 22.11.2024 registered at P.S. Special Police Station (SOG), District -ATS & SOG, whereby the applicant-accused has charged under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B of IPC and Sections 3, 4, 6, 7 & 10 of Rajasthan Public Examination (Measures for Prevention of Unfair Means in Recruitment) Act, 2022.
2. The applicant was arrested on 26.11.2024 and is in judicial custody since then. The Court below has dismissed the bail application.
3.
Learned counsel for the applicant relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicant is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. He
[2025:RJ-JP:30686] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-614/2025] referred order dated 24.02.2025 passed by a Co-ordinate Bench wherein Bench has allowed bail application of Sunil Kumar in almost identical case wherein a dummy candidate has appeared in PTI Examination. He further submits that the allegation on present applicant is that he has not appeared himself in PTI Direct Recruitment Examination, 2022 and instead of him some other person has appeared. He further submits that this is not a case of involvement with any gang or other person. Further, he submits that the investigation relating to present applicant-accused is complete and is no more required by the Investigating Agency for investigation. He further assures that in case, the applicant-accused is required for further investigation, the applicant-accused will be available for such investigation. He also submits that the investigation will take its own time and no purpose will be served by keeping the applicant-accused in custody. At last, he submits that this applicant is in custody since 26.11.2024, hence, he is entitled to be released on bail on ground of custody. 4. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. 5. Heard learned counsel for the applicant-accused along with learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record. 6. On basis of report that present applicant has not appeared as candidate in PTI Examination, 2022 and further he has submitted different details, a case was registered and investigated. This applicant-accused was arrested on
[2025:RJ-JP:30686] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-614/2025] 26.11.2024 and except present applicant no other was found involved till date rather investigation has been kept pending against Prakash Dhatarwal, Hardana Ram and Satya Sai University of technology and Medical Sciences, Sihor. A Co- ordinate Bench of has granted bail to Sunil Kumar in identical case registered as FIR No.58/2024 at Special Police Station (SOG). 7. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant- accused. 8.
Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Laaduram S/o Bhikharam Bishnoi, is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with
evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. [2025:RJ-JP:30686] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-614/2025] (iii) The applicant-accused shall mark his attendance on every first Monday of every month at concerned Police Station till disposal of the sessions case. (iv) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (v) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /46