- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:10906 WP No. 27666 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 27666 OF 2024 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: M/S EXCEL SPORTS A PROPRIETARY CONCERN SITUATED AT NO.1A, NEXT TO CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA, MAJESTIC CIRCLE, BENGALURU - 560 009 REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, RAJIENDER SINGH KHANUJA. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ABHINAY Y.T., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE N R SQUARE, BENGALURU - 560 002 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 2. THE EDUCATION OFFICER BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE N R SQUARE, BENGALURU - 560 002 3. THE SENIOR ASSISTANT DIRECTOR BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, N R SQUARE, BENGALURU - 560 002 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.L. SANJEEV, ADVOCATE FOR R-1 TO R-3) Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:10906 WP No. 27666 of 2024 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 13.06.2023 (ANNEXURE-C1) AND REPRESENTATION DATED 19.01.2024 (ANNEXURE-D) POST THIS W.P. FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING BEFORE SINGLE JUDGE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER The present petition has been filed seeking for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus to direct the 1st respondent to consider the representations at Annexures-C1 and D, by virtue of which the petitioner has sought for release of payments and clear the bills raised for the work done. 2. An affidavit has been filed by the Senior Assistant Director Education, BBMP and the affidavit states regarding clearance of the payment due at Paragraph Nos. 3 and 4 which reads as follows: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:10906 WP No. 27666 of 2024 "3. I further submit that the concerned department has already sanctioned the amount of Rs.27,95,530/- payable to the petitioner. 4. In view of the above, I submit that the corporation would require a period of 60 days to deposit the sanctioned amount of Rs.27,95,530/- to the petitioner's account." 3. Recording the contents of the affidavit extracted above, petition is disposed off in terms of the undertaking given at Paragraph No.4. Needless to state if the payments are not honoured, necessarily respondents are to seek for extension of time before this Court. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE VP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0