1 2025:CGHC:35096 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7484 of 2025 1 - Smt. Gayatri Verma W/o Rajendra Verma Aged About 47 Years Presently Posted As Lecturer (Biolodgy) At Govt. High School Urkura, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Director Directorate Public Instruction, First Floor, Cblock, Indravati Bhavan, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Divisional Joint Director Education Division Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 4 - The District Education Officer District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - The Block Education Officer Block Dharsiwa, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Smt. Anshul Jain Presently Posted As Lecturer (Biology) At Govt. High Schoool Urkura, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) ---- Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Dubey, Advocate For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Mayur Khandelwal, Panel Lawyer VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2025.07.24 11:26:35 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice R avindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 22/07/2025 1. This is second round of litigation. In the earlier round of litigation the writ petition filed by the petitioner against his/her transfer order after declaring surplus Lecturer under the Rationalization Instructions, was disposed of on 19.06.2025 with liberty to move fresh representation, if already not made, and in turn the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee was directed to decide the same within specific time period. Now this petition has been filed after rejection of representation filed by the petitioner. 2. The counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted a Committee headed by the Director, Public Instructions, vide notification dated 08.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 08.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 08.07.2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue 3 his/her representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 08.07.2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved