- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:11395-DB WP No. 23308 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K WRIT PETITION NO. 23308 OF 2023 (EDN-MED ADM) BETWEEN: MR. SHEHAN HASHIM AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, S/O HASHIM R/AT LIHANS MLA ROAD, KOTTOOLY P.O KUTHIRAVATTOM CALICUT, KOZHIKODE, KERALA-673 016. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ABHISHEK MALIPATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE 560 001. 2. KARNATAKA EXAMINATIONS AUTHORITY MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE-560 012 REPRESENTED BY EXECUTIVE AUTHORITY, KARNATAKA EXAMINATION AUTHORITY-560 012 3. KANACHUR INSTITTUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE AND RESEARCH CENTRE, Digitally signed by MAYAGAIAH VINUTHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:11395-DB WP No. 23308 of 2023 MANGALORE MANGALORE-THOKKOTTU-KONAJE UNIVERSITY RD, KOTEKAR, DERALAKATTE, KARNATAKA-575 018. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, AGA FOR R1, SRI. N.K. RAMESH, ADVOCATE FOR R2, SMT. HALEEMA AMEEN, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TO ADMIT THE PETITIONER TO KANACHUR INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE AND RESEARCH CENTRE, MANGALORE/RESPONDENT NO.3 FOR M.D. PEDIATRICS IN PURSUANT TO THE SEAT ALLOTTED TO HIM IN THE SECOND ROUND OF COUNSELLING BY RECEIVING THE FEES OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE PERMIT THE PETITIONER TO PARTICIPATE IN THE THIRD ROUND OF THE COUNSELLING CONDUCTED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2/KARNATAKA EXAMINATION AUTHORITY AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:11395-DB WP No. 23308 of 2023 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed a memo on record seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition on the ground that the petition has become infructuous. 2. Memo for withdrawal is taken on record. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 4. In view of dismissal of the main appeal, all pending applications do not survive for consideration and the same are disposed of. SD/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE KTY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22