Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33512 (KAR)

SMT. RAZIA BEGUM v. MR MOHAMMED SHATHAB

RFA/128/2018 · 2025-07-11

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25460 RFA No. 128 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 128 OF 2018 BETWEEN: SMT. RAZIA BEGUM W/O LATE AZEEZ KHAN, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, P.B. ROAD, MUDIGERE TOWN, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT-577 101. …APPELLANT (BY SMT. SIMRAN SINGH., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. BRIJESH PATIL., ADVOCATE) AND: MR. MOHAMMED SHATHAB S/O SRI.ATHAULLA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, GONIGADDE VILLAGE, HALE MUDIGERE, MUDIGERE TALUK, CHIKKAMGALURU DISTRICT-577 101. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. PRADEEP NAIK.K., ADVOCATE FOR C/R) THIS REGULARFIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25460 RFA No. 128 of 2018 ORAL ORDER Smt.Simran Singh., counsel on behalf of Sri.Brijesh Patil., for the appellant has appeared through video conferencing. Sri.Pradeep Naik.K., counsel for the respondent has appeared in person. Counsel for the appellant submits that the sole appellant is no more. Counsel Sri.Pradeep Naik.K., submits that the appeal was listed in 2023 and a submission was made by counsel for the appellant that the sole appellant died. Counsel therefore, submits that an appropriate order may be passed. Submission is noted. Application to bring the legal representative of deceased sole appellant is not filed. By operation of law, the Regular First Appeal abates. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 24