Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33506 (AP)

KASIREDDI YARKANNA v. PALLI POTHUNAIDU AND 7 OTHERS

AS/442/2010 · 2025-07-07

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010504602010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI FIRST APPEAL No: 442/2010 Between: 1. KASIREDDI YARKANNA, S/O. MARUNAIDU CULTIVATION R/O. KRISHNAMPALEM RAMBILLI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT ...APPELLANT AND 1. PALLI POTHUNAIDU AND 7 OTHERS, S/O. APPANNA CULTIVATION DOPPARLA VILLAGE ATCHUTAPURAM MADNAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 2. KAISREDDY SATYANARAYANA, S/O. MARUNAIDU CULTIVATION R/O. KRISHNAMPALEM RAMBILLI MANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 3. KASIREDDY APPALANAIDU, S/O. MARUNAIDU CULTIVATION R/O. KRISHNAMPALEM RAMBILLI MANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 4. KASIREDDY RAMU, S/O. MARUNAIDU CULTIVATION R/O. KRISHNAMPALEM RAMBILLI MANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 5. KASIREDDY LAKSHMANA, S/O. MARUNAIDU CULTIVATION R/O. KRISHNAMPALEM RAMBILLI MANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 6. KASIREDDY LAKSHMI, W/O. APPARAO HOUSEWIFE R/O. KRISHNAMPALEM RAMBILLI MANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 7. SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR CUM LAO, APHC., INDUSTRIAL ESTATE COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM. 8. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, (RR 2 TO 6 ARE NOT NECESSARY PARTIES) ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Appellant: 1. K SARVA BHOUMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. M S R SUBRAHMANYAM The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI APPEAL SUIT No.442 OF 2010 J U D G M E N T: Sri K.Sarvabhouma Rao, learned counsel for the appellant present through V.C. and would submit that the matter become infructuous, as settled out of Court. The same is recorded. 2. Learned counsel representing Sri M.S.R.Subrahmanyam, learned counsel for the respondent is in attendance. 3. In that view of the matter, the Appeal Suit is dismissed as infructuous, as settled out of Court. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI 08.07.2025 Psk THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI 48 APPEAL SUIT No.442 OF 2010 Date:08.07.2025 Psk