Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33502 (KAR)

MR RAMANNA POOJARY v. MRS LEELAVATHI

RSA/530/2020 · 2025-01-29

K Natarajan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:4149 RSA No. 530 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 530 OF 2020 (PAR) BETWEEN: MR RAMANNA POOJARY, S/O LATE MR.BASPPA POOJARY, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, RESIDING AT KOTE HOSUE, PARENKI VILLAGE, MADANTHYAR POST, BELTHANGADY TALUK, D.K.DISTRICT 574224. APPELLANT (BY SRI. RAVISHANKAR SHASTRY G.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MRS LEELAVATHI, W/O SUNDARA POOJARY, AGED ABOUT 61YEARS, RESIDIGN AT KARAMBADA HOUSE, ULI VILLAGE AND POST, BANTWAL TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT PIN – 574219. 2. BOODA POOJARY, S/O.LATE MR.BASAPPA POOJARY, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, RESIDING AT KOTE HOUSE, PARENKY VILLAGE, MADANTHYAR POT, BELTHANGADY TALUK, D.K.DISTRICT 574224. 3. SUNDARA POOJARY, S/O LATE MR.BASAPAP POOJARY, Digitally signed by VEDAVATHI A K Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:4149 RSA No. 530 of 2020 AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, RESIDING AT KOTE HOUE, PARENKI VILALGE, MADANTHYAR POST, BELTHANGADY TALUK, D.K.DISTRICT 574224. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M RAJASHEKAR., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. TK MOHAN DAS FOR R1; SRI. C PRAKASH REDDY., FOR R2; R3 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC.,AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 14.10.2019 PASSED IN RA No.18/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., AT BELTHANGADY ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.02.2018 PASSED IN OS No.3/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., AT BELTHANGADY AND ETC,. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant has field a memo for withdrawing the appeal and submits that there said to be settle between them. 2. Memo is taken on record and the submission is placed on record. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:4149 RSA No. 530 of 2020 3. In view of the memo and the submission, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Pending interlocutory applications do not survive for consideration. Sd/- (K.NATARAJAN) JUDGE PNV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10