- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21422 RFA No. 232 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 232 OF 2017 (SP) BETWEEN: 1. 1(a) 1(b) 1(c) L.NAGESH S/O D.LINGEGOWDA. SINCE DEAD BY PROPOSED LR'S, USHA RANI.S. W/O LATE L.NAGESH, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, KUM. DHANYATHA, D/O LATE L.NAGESH, AGED ABOUT 13 YEARS, MASTER GOURAV SKANDA S/O LATE L.NAGESH, AGED ABOUT 9 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT: D.No.2500, CH-40/A, 5TH CROSS, NEW KANTHARAJ URS RAOD, K.G. KOPPAL, MUSURU-570 009. 2. RAVIKUMAR S/O SIDDALINGASHETTY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT A-02-111, ISH EXTENSION, BOGADI, MYSURU-570 016. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. RAKSHITH JOIS., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21422 RFA No. 232 of 2017 AND: 1. H.C.SRINIVASA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, 2. N.SHWETHA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, D/O H.C.SRINIVASA MURTHY, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.23, SRIPADA, N BLOCK, KUVEMPUNAGAR, MYSORE-570 015. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. A.G.RAVIKUMAR., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & 2) THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 READ WITH ORDER XLI RULE 1 OF THE CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the appellants are not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. Sri.A.G.Ravi Kumar., counsel for respondents 1 and 2 has appeared through video conferencing. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21422 RFA No. 232 of 2017 As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 12.06.2023, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants. A perusal of the appeal papers would reflect that the appeal is filed in 2017. Now we are in the month of June, 2025. The appeal is pending from eight years. As already noted above, when the case is called, the appellants are not represented. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Because of dismissal of the appeal, the interlocutory applications, if any, are disposed of and the interim order if any stands discharged. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12