1 2025:CGHC:35112 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7381 of 2025 1 - Ashutosh Kumar Singh S/o Ramesh Singh Aged About 46 Years R/o -K-4/s- 7 Vasundhra Vihar Godhanpur Ambikapur District- Surguja (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Medical Education (Ayush) Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Deputy Secretary Department Of Medical Education (Ayush) Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawam Atal Nagar District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - District Ayurved Officer District- Surguja (C.G.) 4 - Dr. Sandhya Pandey, Ayush Wing District Hospital Ambikapur District Surguja (C.G.) ---- Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Kanwaljeet Singh Saini, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice R avindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2025.07.24 12:04:50 +0530 2 22/07/2025 1. Challenge in this petition is the order of transfer dated 26.06.2025, whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Surguja to Surajpur. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that, against the said transfer order the petitioner has already made representation, which is still pending before the transfer committee. As per Clause 8 of the transfer policy dated 05.06.2025, there is in-house remedy for making representation against the transfer order before the transfer committee, who will consider the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with law. Clause 8 of the said transfer policy dated 05.06.2025 is reproduced as below:- “8. स्थानांतरण से व्यथिथत शासकीय सेवक द्वारा अपने स्थानांतरण के विवरूद्ध अभ्यावेदन के वल स्थानांतरण नीतित के उल्लंघन होने पर ही उक्त उल्लंघन होने वाले कं ति$का के संबंध में स्पष्ट आधारों के साथ स्थानांतरण आदेश जारी होने की तितथिथ से 15 विदवस के भीतर प्रश्नाधीन स्थानांतरण आदेश की प्रतित सविहत शासन द्वारा गवि1त वरिरष्ठ सति4वों की सविमतित के संयोजक एवं सति4व, सामान्य प्रशासन विवभाग को प्रस्तुत विकया जा सके गा। सविमतित द्वारा ऐसे प्रकरणों का इस स्थानांतरण नीतित के प्रकाश में परीक्षण करने के पश्चात अपनी अनुशंसा संबतिधत विवभाग को प्रेवि=त की जाएगी।” 3. Be that as it may, since in-house remedy has been provided to the employee concerned to raise the grievances before the transfer committee against transfer order, this Court deem it appropriate to direct the petitioner to move fresh representation before the transfer committee along with copy of this order within a week from the date of receipt of copy of this order and the transfer committee, in turn, shall take a decision on the representation, so made by the petitioner, in accordance 3 with law, in an objective manner and pass a reasoned order, on its own merits, within a further period of two weeks. Till then no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner. 4. The petitioner is directed to produce a copy of this order within a week from today to the said transfer committee. 5. The writ petition, accordingly, stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation and direction. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved