IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22211 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-109 Year-2024 Thana- AMDABAD District- Katihar ====================================================== Shankar Yadav S/o Late Narayan Yadav R/o Kauamor, PS- Amdabad, Distt- Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 4 23-07-2025 Heard the parties. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Amdabad P.S. Case No. 109 of 2024 for the offence registered under sections 341, 323, 376, 511, 354B, 379, 504, 506/34 of the IPC lodged on 09.06.2024 by the informant, Soni Devi. 3. As per the prosecution story, the informant who is daughter-in-law alleged that on the fateful afternoon, as she was alone, the petitioner tried to commit rape and in the process, outraged her modesty. A Panchayati took place couple of days later where she was also assaulted which led to the FIR. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the lady has lodged the FIR in the haste of her husband, no such incident took place and he has also petitioned the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22211 of 2025(4) dt.23-07-2025 2/2 Superintendent of Police, Katihar in this regard. 5. Learned APP, on the other hand, has taken this Court to the case diary to show that process under Section 82/83 of the Cr.P.C. stands concluded inasmuch as posters have been affixed on his house. 6. Considering the facts on record/allegation as also the development that has taken place in between, in the opinion of the Court, the petitioner seek bail. 7. The anticipatory bail application stands rejected. 8. This Court has taken note of the petition preferred by the petitioner before the S.P., Katihar and would like to add that he is duty-bound to take the matter to its logical conclusion by deputing a Deputy S.P. to supervise and submit a report to him in this regard. 9. With the aforesaid observation, the anticipatory bail application stands rejected. Vijay Singh/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U T