Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:45121
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7531 of 2025 1 - Smt. Seema Sarkar W/o Gopal Sarkar, Aged About 49 Years Presently Working As Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Middle School, Dubbatota, Block Konta District Sukma (Chhattisgarh)
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Director, Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3 - Collector, District Sukma (Chhattisgarh) 4 - District Education Officer, Sukma, District Sukma (Chhattisgarh) 5 - Block Education Officer, Konta, District Sukma (Chhattisgarh)
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rupendra Kumar Dewangan, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. S. Choubey, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J
Order on Board 10/07/2025 ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2025.09.03 19:54:01 +0530
2
1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 01.06.2025, whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Govt. Girls Higher Secondary Schoo, Konta to Govt. Middle School, Dubbatota, under the rationalization instructions.
2. The counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the petitioner has joined but still she wants to make her fresh representation. He would further submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner vide notification dated 07.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07.07.2025 and the Committee be
directed to decide the same within stipulated time period.
3.
Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025.
4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue his/her representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law in an objective manner by passing reasoned order as early as possible. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Alok