RASHMI RAWAT v. MUSSOORIE DEHRADUN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
WPMS/703/2025 · 2025-03-05
Ravindra Maithani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3349 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3349 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
WPMS No. 703 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Siddhartha Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M.S. Bisht, Brief Holder for the State. Mr. Rahul Consul, Advocate for the MDDA. The petitioner purchased a land of Khasra No. 241M, ad measuring 363.01 sq. mts. in village Purukul, Pargana Pachwadoon, Dehradun and raised certain constructions over it. She was served with a show cause notice by the respondent no. 1 MDDA. The petitioner filed an application for compounding, which was rejected by the respondent no. 1 Development Authority on 04.09.2024, against which an appeal was preferred by the petitioner before the Commissioner, Garhwal Division. The appeal was also rejected on
14.11.2024. Both these orders are impugned in the writ petition. It is the further case of the petitioner that she has preferred a revision before the respondent no. 3, but no date has been fixed on it and meanwhile sealing order has been passed. After arguing for a while, learned counsel for petitioner would submit that the respondent no. 3 may be directed to inform the petitioner an early date of hearing and decide the revision, as early as possible. Learned State Counsel would submit that within two days, the date of hearing in the revision shall be communicated to the petitioner and thereafter the revision shall be decided on merits. The Court takes on record the statement of the learned State Counsel. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. (Ravindra Maithani J.)
05.03.2025 Avneet/