Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3349 (AP)

Avula Danamma, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/927/2025 · 2025-01-22

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam, R Raghunandan Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 927 OF 2025 Between: Avula Danamma, W/o Late Yanadaiah, Aged about 49 years, Occ: house wife, R/o. Door No.2-135/1 Katarivaripalem Village, Challareddypalem Panchayat, Vetapalem Mandal, Bapatia District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. The Superintendent of Police, Srikakulam District, Srikakulam The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Police Sub-Division, Palasa, Srikakulam District. The Superindent of Police, Baptia District, Baptla. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Police Sub-Division, Chirala, Baptla District. The Station House officer, Itchapuram Rural Police Station, Itchapuram Srikakulam District The Station House Officer, Chirla Rural Police Station, Chirala Baptla District. Kasi Muthy, S/o. non known. Mediator in Fish business, C/o. Fishing Export Centre Sea Shore Area, Itchapuram, Srikakulam District. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue Writ order may or direction more particularly on in the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus declaring the inaction of the Respondents 2 to 7 to register petitioners complaint dt.05-01-2025 and Avula Jala babu from the custody of the 8 enquire to trace out my son Respondent as illegal, irregular, constitution of India and against consequently direct the Respondents 2 to 7 to produce my son i.e Avula Jala Babu before this Hon’ble High Court, who detained and under custody of the 8 Respondent from the hands of the S* Respondents detention arbitrary and violative of Article 21 of the the principles of natural justice and and to release him and protect my son and save his life. lA NO: 1 OF 2()9R Petition under Section 151 CPC stated in the affidavit filed i praying that in the circumstances in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent Nos.2 to 7 to authorites to produce my son i.e. Jala Babu before this Hon’ble High Court, who detained and under custody of 8'^ Respondent in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI V. KRISHNA SWAROOP Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 7 : THE ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.8 : NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010015522025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) lU [3508] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM i } WRIT PETITION NO: 92712025 Between: Avula Danamma, ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.V KRISHNA SWAROOP Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following order: (per Hon'ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) Learned counsel for the petitioner, after verification submits that the detenue had been handed over to the petitioner. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner intends to initiate further action in relation to the injuries suffered, by the detenue, in the hands of the unofficial respondent. He further submits that a complaint has already been made in this regard, to the respondents 6 & 7. 2 2. In view of the fact that the detenue had been set free, this Writ Petition is closed leaving it open to the petitioner and the detenue to take such i action as they deem necessary against any injury that the detenue may have suffered. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- N. NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// S^CTOfTblFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri V. Krishna Swaroop, Advocate 2. TwoCCsto The Advocate General Amaravati [OUT] 3. Three C.D. Copies. [OPUC] High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Cnr HIGH COURT DATED:22/01/2025 ORDER 5 3 1 JAN 2025 oV WP.No.927 of 2025 o «o// . Current aection CLOSING THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS