Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33489 (MAD)

The Management v. The Commissioner of Employees Compensation

CMP/7479/2025 · 2025-07-15

Sathi Kumar Sukumara Kurup

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CMP No. 7479 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15-07-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP CMP No. 7479 of 2025 in C.M.A.S.R.No.34605 of 2025 1. The Management M/s. Sakthi Auto Ancillary (P) Ltd., Edikarai Road, NGGO Colony, Coimbatore 641 022. Appellant(s) Vs 1. The Commissioner of Employees Compensation Coimbatore 18. 2.B. Arulpriya W/o. late. Rameshkumar, D.No.4/82, Sakkilipatti Village, Kongu Vembu Post, Harur Taluk, Dharmapuri 636 902. 3.Minor. R. Thiruvasagapriyan S/o. Rameshkumar, No.4/82, Sakkilipatti Village, Kongu Vembu Post, Harur Taluk, Dharmapuri Dt 636 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 7479 of 2025 902. Rep by his Mother and Natural Guardian B. Arulpriya. 4.Minor. R. Keerthilakshmi D/o. Rameshkumar, No.4/82, Sakkilipatti Village, Kongu Vembu Post, Harur Taluk, Dharmapuri Dt 636 902. Rep by his Mother and Natural Guardian B. Arulpriya. Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): I. Saiyeekrishna For Respondent(s): M/s.P.Shagani for Rr2 To 4 ORDER Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the petition has been filed by the Management, M/s. Sakthi Auto Ancillary (P) Ltd, the Respondent in E.C.No.67 of 2021. 2. Learned Counsel appearing for Respondents 2 to 4 as Claimants in the E.C Petition, objects to the petition to condone the delay on the ground https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 7479 of 2025 that it is a delaying tactics and therefore, prayed for dismissal of the petition. 3. On a query raised by this Court whether the Appellant herein as Respondent in E.C Petition had deposited the amount, learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that a sum of Rs.12,21,990/- had been deposited on the file of ' the Joint Commissioner of Labour ', Coimbatore. 4. Considering the submission of the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the objections raised by the Respondent/Claimant, since the amount had already been deposited, there cannot be any difficulty for the Respondents to withdraw the amount, the petition in C.M.P.No.7479 of 2025 is allowed. 5. The Respondents being the Claimants are permitted to withdraw 1/3 of the amount, which had been already deposited on the file of the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 7479 of 2025 Joint Commissioner of Labour, Coimbatore. 6. Registry is directed to number the Appeal if it is otherwise in order and to print the name of the learned Counsel appearing for the Respondents when the Appeal is posted before the appropriate Bench. 15-07-2025 shl Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 7479 of 2025 To 1.The Commissioner of Employees Compensation Coimbatore 18. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 7479 of 2025 SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP J. CMP No. 7479 of 2025 15-07-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis