Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33488 (HP)

JEET SINGH THAKUR AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/20334/2025 · 2025-12-23

Sushil Kukreja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.20334 of 2025 Decided on: 23.12.2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jeet Singh Thakur & Ors. …..Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and Ors .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Kush Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sushil Kukreja Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 3. Petitioners’ grievance is that their representation Annexure P-3, seeking applicability of CWP No. 1638 of 2024, titled Mohit Sharma & Anr. Versus State of H.P. & Ors., decided on 29.11.2024 has not been decided till 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer. 4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioners in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment in the case of Mohit Sharma within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioners. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Sushil Kukreja) December 23, 2025 Judge R.Atal