Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33487 (RAJ)

ALOK KUMAR v. THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS

CW/18715/2022 · 2025-08-06

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:30210] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18715/2022 Alok Kumar, Trading As Mittal Bhai Tools, 45, Surendra Pal Colony, New Sanganer Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus The Registrar Of Trade Marks, (Govt. Of India) Near Chanakyapuri Overbridge, Ghatlodiya, Ahmedabad (Guj.) ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Dharmendra Kumar Gupta for Mr.Ghanshyam Das Bansal For Respondent(s) : None present JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 06/08/2025 1. A limited prayer has been made by the counsel for the petitioner for issuing direction to the Registrar Trade Mark to decide the application submitted by the petitioner seeking registration of the trademark, which is lying pending since 2007. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the aforesaid application seeking registration of the trade mark has been submitted by the petitioner in the Office of Registrar Trade Mark in the year 2007, but in spite of passing of more than 18 years, till date, the said application has not decided either way by passing a reasoned and speaking order. 3. It is not expected from the Authorities concerned to keep such application pending for an indefinite time, herein the instant case, more than 18 years have passed and still, the application is still lying pending for its adjudication on its merits. [2025:RJ-JP:30210] (2 of 2) [CW-18715/2022] 4. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter, the instant writ petition stands disposed of by issuing direction to the Registrar Trade Mark to decide the application (pending, if any) submitted by the petitioner expeditiously as early as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order, after following the due process of law. 5. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /58