[2025:RJ-JP:5921] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18654/2024 1. Gulab Bai Wife Of Shri Somnath, Resident Of Purohit Ji Ki Tapri, Canal Road, Police Station Railway Colony, Kota Junction, Kota City, Rajasthan. 2. Saraswati Wife Of Shri Ramsnehi, Resident Of Purohit Ji Ki Tapri. Canal Road, Police Station Railway Colony, Kota Junction, Kota City, Rajasthan. 3. Pooran Chand Son Of Shri Tek Chand, Resident Of Purohit Ji Ki Tapri, Canal Road, Police Station Railway Colony, Kota Junction, Kota City, Rajasthan. 4. Lakshmi Chand Son Of Shri Ghisya Lal, Resident Of Purohit Ji Ki Tapri, Canal Road, Police Station Railway Colony, Kota Junction, Kota City, Rajasthan. 5. Smt. Radha Devi Wife Of Shri Ram Swaroop, Resident Of Purohit Ji Ki Tapri, Canal Road, Police Station Railway Colony, Kota Junction, Kota City, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary To Government Department Of Law And Legal Affair, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 4. The Chairman, District Legal Services Authorities Kota, Rajasthan. 5. The Secretary, District Legal Services Authorities Kota, Rajasthan. 6. The District Collector, Kota City Kota, Rajasthan. 7. The Superintendent Of Police, Kota City Kota, Rajasthan. 8. The Station House Officer, Police Station Railway Colony, Kota City Kota, Rajasthan. 9. Shri Praveen Kumar Verma, Rjs, The Contemporaneous Secretary, The District Legal Service Authority, Kota. [2025:RJ-JP:5921] (2 of 2) [CW-18654/2024] 10. Vinod Kumar Bairwa Son Of Shri Chittar Lal, Resident Of Near Ramdev Temple, Purohit Ji Ki Tapri, Railway Colony, Kota Junction, Kota City, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Tiwari For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 11/02/2025 1. Five petitioners have preferred this writ petition jointly, claiming compensation to the tune of Rs.50,00,000/- for each petitioner against the respondents, alleging that on account of arbitrary and illegal acts of respondents, petitioners suffered huge damages due to demolition drive in respect of their residential houses. 2. The writ petition involves disputed questions of fact which are required to be established through evidence, hence, such questions of fact are not amenable to be adjudicated by the High Court in writ jurisdiction and petitioners have the appropriate and alternative remedy to claim damages before the Civil Court. 3. In view of above, counsel for petitioners prays for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to approach before the Civil Court. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. 5. All pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J RONAK JAIMAN/45