Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33474 (HP)

BHARAT BHUSHAN v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/20013/2025 · 2025-12-23

Sandeep Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.20013 of 2025 Date of Decision: 23.12.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Bharat Bhushan ……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Ashwani K. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) While placing on record communication dated 22.12.2025, issued under the signatures of Director Health Services, Himachal Pradesh, enclosing therewith copy of office order dated 20.12.2025 passed by the afore authority, to state that petitioner herein, who was earlier ordered to be transferred to Civil Hospital Shillai, District Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh vide office order dated 15.12.2025, has been adjusted at CHC Jalog, District Shimla, against vacancy, which is a soft area, vide office order dated 20.12.2025. 2. Having carefully perused aforesaid documents, which are taken on record, this Court finds merit in the afore submission of learned Additional Advocate General. Since precise grouse of the petitioner is that he was sent to a hard area stands redressed and petitioner has now been sent to a soft area, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly, the same is disposed of. 3. However, while imparting, this Court wishes to observe that since petitioner is on the verge of promotion within four months, coupled with the fact that one vacancy is likely to arise at Jassur, District Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, respondents, at that time, may consider the petitioner’s posting at afore station, if there is no other technical hitch. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. December 23, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (sunil) Judge 2