Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33473 (MAD)

M.ANANDHAN v. M.MANOHARAN

CMP/7947/2023 · 2025-06-20

G Jayachandran

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20-06-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN C.M.P.Nos.7947, 7949 and 7950 of 2023 in A.S.No.483 of 2022 1.M.Anandhan Son of Mr.Munusamy, No.7, Raghavan Garden, Mylapore, Chennai 600 005. 2.Mrs.Shenbagavalli, Wife of Mr.Anandhan, No.7, Raghavan Garden, Mylapore, Chennai 600 005. 3.A.Manivannan Son of Mr.Anandhan No.7, Raghavan Garden, Mylapore, Chennai 600 005. 4.A.Madhan, Son of Mr.Anandhan, No.7 Raghavan Garden, Mylapore, Chennai 600 005. 5.A.Sridharan, Son of Mr.Anandhan, No.7, Raghavan Garden, 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Mylapore, Chennai 600 005. 6.A.Ammu, Daughter of Mr.Anandhan, No.7, Raghavan Garden, Mylapore, Chennai 600 005. .. Petitioners/Appellants in all cases /versus/ 1.Mr.M.Manoharan(deceased) Son of Munusamy, No.7, Raghavan Garden, Mylapore, Chennai 600 005. 2.K.Gowri(deceased), No.6, Raghavan Garden, Mylapore, Chennai 600 005. 3.K.Ravi, Son of Kuttappan, No.7, Raghavan Garden, Mylapore, Chennai 600 005. 4.N.Janithi, Wife of Natarasan, No.7, Raghavan Garden, Mylapore, Chennai 600 005. 5.K.Jayasri, D/o Kuttuappan, No.7, Raghavan Garden, Mylapore, Chennai 600 005. 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 6.K.Suresh, Son of Kuttuappan, No.7, Raghavan Garden, Myalpore, Chennai 600 005. .. Respondents 2 to 5/Respondents 2 to 5 in all cases 7.Mrs.Kumari, Wife of Manoharan(late) No.7, Raghavan Garden, Mylapore, Chennai 600 005. 8.Mrs.Rajinikanth, Son of Manoharan(late), No.7, Raghavan Garden, Mylapore, Chennai 600 005. 9.Mr.Sivachandran, Son of Manoharan(late), No.7, Raghavan Garden, Mylapore, Chennai 600 005. 10.Mrs.Anitha Devi, Son of Manoharan (late) No.7, Raghavan Garden, Myalpore, Chennai 600 005. .. Respondents 7 to 10/proposed respondents 7 to 10 in all cases C.M.P.No.7947 of 2023: This petition has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act praying to condone the delay of 228 days in filing the set aside the abatement petition before this Hon'ble Court in A.S.No.483 of 2022. 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P.No.7949 of 2023: This petition has been filed under Order 22, Rule 9(2) and Section 151 of C.P.C., praying to set aside the abatement against the Mr.Manoharan died on 02.02.2021 in A.S.No.483 of 2022. C.M.P.No.7950 of 2023: This petition has been filed under Order 22, Rule 4 of C.P.C., to bring the legal heirs of late Mr.Manoharan namely, 1.Mrs.Kumari, 2.Mrs.Rajinikanth, 3.Mr.Sivachandran, 4.Mrs.Anitha Devi as proposed parties/respondents 7 to 10 in A.S.No.483 of 2022. For Petitioners :Mr.P.Manikannan COMMON ORDER In view of the death of Manoharan, the first respondent, these petitions are filed to condone the delay of 228 days in filing the petition to set aside the abatement; to set aside the abatement; and to bring the legal heirs of the deceased Manoharan as respondents 7 to 10. 2.Considering the relationship and the reasons stated in the affidavit 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis filed in support of the petitions, these petitions are allowed. 20.06.2025 ari Note:Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment in the main appeal. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Dr.G.Jayachandran,J. ari C.M.P.Nos.7947, 7949 and 7950 of 2023 in A.S.No.483 of 2022 20.06.2025 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis