IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23670 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-133 Year-2024 Thana- Sajore District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Sahdev Sharma Son of Late Kochin Sharma @ Fuchin Sharma Resident of Village - Darha, P.S. - Sajour, District - Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashutosh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. J.N. Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 3 06-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State. 2. In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Sajour P.S. Case No. 133 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(i) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. 3. According to the allegation, the petitioner along with co-accused Naval Sharma, Babu Sharma and Pankaj Sharma badly assaulted the father of the informant and he died. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is no eye witness. There is land dispute between the parties which is the reason behind the false implication of the petitioner. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23670 of 2025(3) dt.06-08-2025 2/2 5. On the other hand, Mr. J.K. Thakur learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail by submitting that the petitioner and co-accused persons badly assaulted the deceased resulting into his death. 6. The deceased aged about 75 years breaths his last in the way to the hospital. According to allegation the petitioner and other three accused persons assaulted him by fists and blows. According to post-mortem report left side of his 3rd and 4th ribs were found fractured with corresponding left side of 3rd and 4th intrecostal space of muscles was found contused. Blood clots was also found at the margin of ruptured heart site. The injury was grievous in nature. The post-mortem report corroborates the allegation mentioned in the FIR. 7. In my view, the petitioner does not deserve the privilege of bail. Accordingly, it is rejected. AjayMishra/- (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) U T