APHC010502632003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 22426/2003 Between: 1. S. SUSEELAMMA, W/O LATE S. ANANDA RAO CORRESPONDENT OF ADI ANDHRA AIDED GIRLS UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL SANGHA PETA, NANDYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNEMNT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD 2. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL, EDUCATION, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT 4. THE DEPUTY EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, NANDYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Appropriate Writ, more in the nature of Mandmaus, declaring the proceedings Rc. No. 15078/A7/2000 dt 28-5-2003 of the 3rd respondent herein in rejecting the proposals for approval of the Selection candidates to the three SG Teachers post in the petitioner School, as being arbitrary illegal and unconstitutional and contrary to the rules framed in G.O.Ms. No. 1 dt 1-1-1994 apart from being in violation of article 30 of the Constituion of India and issue consequently direction directing the 3rd respondents to approve the selections of 3 candidates to the S.G. Teachers of aided vacancies inthe petitioenr School as per the selections made by the Selection committee 25-6-2000 IA NO: 1 OF 2003(WPMP 28033 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondents to approve the selection of the 3SG Teachers post made by the Selection Committee on 25-6-2000, by suspending the Proceeding R.C. No. 15078/A7/2000 dt 28-5-2003 of the 3rd respondent herein, IA NO: 1 OF 2005(WPMP 140 OF 2005 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the 3 respondent to approve the selection of the 2 S.G. Teachers post made by the selection committee on 25-6-2000 as per Memo. No. 3983/PS (2) 2004-2 Dated 5-8-2004, pending final disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S GIRIMOJI RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR EDUCATION 2. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION The Court made the following: ORDER Despite listing the matter under the caption “for dismissal”, there is no representation for the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI RR