Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3346 (CHH)

RAMESH SINGH v. JHADIRAM

WP227/34/2023 · 2025-06-18

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:25768 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 34 of 2023 1 - Ramesh Singh S/o Chandrabhan Singh Aged About 64 Years R/o Village Rohrakala, Police Station Pathariya, District Mungeli (C.G.) 2 - Than Singh S/o Late Son Singh Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Rohrakala, Police Station Pathariya, District Mungeli (C.G.) ... Petitioners versus 1 - Jhadiram S/o Late Pyari Yadav Aged About 54 Years R/o Village Rohrakala, Police Station Pathariya, District Mungeli (C.G.) 2 - Balla S/o Meku Sahu Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Rohrakala, Police Station Pathariya, District Mungeli (C.G.) 3 - Sukhram S/o Basawan Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Rohrakala, Police Station Pathariya, District Mungeli (C.G.) 4 - Ramjee Nishad S/o Mangalu Aged About 64 Years R/o Village Rohrakala, Police Station Pathariya, District Mungeli (C.G.) 5 - Ramlal Sahu S/o Jayata Sahu Aged About 59 Years R/o Village Rohrakala, Police Station Pathariya, District Mungeli (C.G.) 6 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Rohrakala, Police Station Pathariya, District Mungeli (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Ram Narayan Sahu, Advocate For Respondent No. 6 : Ms. Apurva Nigam, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Hariom Rai, Advocate Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 19/06/2025 1. As per office report, Civil Suit bearing No. 33-A/2022 has already been disposed of by the learned trial Court on 24.04.2025 and thus, this petition has become infructuous. 2. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti