Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33457 (PNJ)

(O&M) JAI KUMAR ETC. v. MOHINDER SINGH

RSA/2173/1997 · 2025-08-07

Vikas Bahl

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RSA-2173-1997 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (202) RSA-2173-1997 (O&M) Date of decision: - 07.08.2025 Jai Kumar and others ....Appellants Versus Mohinder Singh and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present:- Mr. Ankush Sheoran, Advocate for Mr. Samrat Malik, Advocate, for appellants No.2 to 6. None for the respondents. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel appearing for appellants No.2 to 6 has submitted that in the present case, appellant No.1/Jai Kumar, who as per the case of other appellants is junior, had already withdrawn the present Regular Second Appeal vide order dated 06.07.2001 and had thereafter instituted a civil suit and in pursuance of the judgment in the said civil suit, the said Jai Kumar had been promoted in the month of November, 2005. It is further submitted that in view of the said subsequent events, appellants No.2 to 6 seek to withdraw the present Regular Second Appeal with liberty to institute appropriate proceedings to claim parity with Jai Kumar and also to raise other issues in the same. NARESH KUMAR 2025.08.08 16:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement RSA-2173-1997 (O&M) -2- 3. Dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty. 4. It is made clear that in case the appellants No.2 to 6 institute any such proceedings, then, the same would be considered independently, in accordance with law. ( VIKAS BAHL ) August 07, 2025 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No NARESH KUMAR 2025.08.08 16:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement