Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33456 (CHH)

DEVENDRA NATH MANDAVI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/7421/2025 · 2025-07-14

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:32852 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7421 of 2025 1 - Devendra Nath Mandavi S/o Mudaram Mandavi, Aged About 53 Years Occupation Assistant Teacher (L.B.) R/o Village And Tehsil Chindgadh, District Sukma (Chhattisgarh) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Matralaya, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Director, Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indravati Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Collector Sukma, District Sukma (Chhattisgarh) 4 - District Education Officer, District Sukma Chhattisgarh/ Member Secretary District Level Rationalization Committee, Sukma (Chhattisgarh) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rishabh Bisen, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. S. Choubey, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J. Order on Board 15/07/2025 ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2025.07.15 19:53:35 +0530 2 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the matter pertains to transfer under the rationalization instructions dated 02.08.2024 and he has been transferred. 2. From perusal of the impugned order (Annexure P/2) it transpires that it is not readable. Learned counsel for the petitioner is also not able to demonstrate the place where he has been transferred. 3. On this ground alone, the present writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Alok