Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33453 (PNJ)

(O&M) MOHINDER SINGH v. NEM CHAND

CR/4856/2002 · 2025-05-05

Alok Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CR-4856-2002 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (101) CR-4856-2002 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 05.05.2025 Mohinder Singh ……Petitioner Versus Nem Chand ……Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Present: Mr. M.L.Sarin, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ritesh Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Dhawan, Advocate for the respondent. **** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as for the respondent are ad idem that the matter has been amicably resolved between the parties. He further takes a stand that the petitioner has peacefully taken over the possession and there is no objection on behalf of the respondent, who admits that the entire payment has been received. 2. In light of the above, nothing survives in the present petition and the same is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 3. Pending applications, if any, stands disposed of. (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE 05.05.2025 Parul Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No PARUL 2025.05.06 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document