- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19680 RFA No. 1816 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1816 OF 2017 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: ANJANAPPA SON OF LATE MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESIDING AT BANARAHALLI ANUGONDANAHALLI HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DIST-560 067. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. BABU., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. MUNIYELLAPPA SON OF LATE MUNISHAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, RESIDING AT KODATHIGATE, VARTHUR HOBLI, CARMELARAM POST, SARJAPURA MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE-560 035. 2. VENKATARAMAIAH SON OF LATE MUNISHAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, RESIDING AT BANARAHALLI VILLAGE, ANUGONDAHALLI HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-560 067. 3. MUNIYAPPA SON OF LATE MUNISHAMAPPA, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19680 RFA No. 1816 of 2017 AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, RESIDING AT BANARAHALLI VILLAGE, ANUGONDAHALLI HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-560 067. 4. SMT. MUNIYAMMA WIFE OF LATE MUNIMADHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RESIDING AT BANARAHALLI VILLAGE, ANUGONDAHALLI HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-560 067. 5. 5(a) MADAPPA ALIAS MUNIMADAPPA, SON OF LATE MUNISHAMAPPA, SINCE DEAD BY LR'S, MUNITHAYAMMA WIFE OF LATE MADAPPA, AGED 30 YEARS, 5(b) SUNANDAMMA D/O LATE MADAPPA ALIAS MUNIMADAPPA, AGED 30 YEARS, 5(c) MANJUNATHA SON OF LATE MADAPPA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, 5(d) DEVENDRA SON OF LATE MADAPPA ALIAS MUNIMADAPPA, AGED 33 YEARS, 5(e) MUNILAKSHMAMMA D/O LATE MADAPPA ALIAS MUNIADAPPA, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19680 RFA No. 1816 of 2017 ALL ARE RESIDING AT BANARAHALLI ANUGONDANAHALLI HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-560 067. 6. SMT. MUNIYAMMA D/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA, 7. SMT. MUNIYELLAMMA D/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA, W/O DASAPPA, AGED MAJOR, BOTH OF THEM ARE RESIDING AT BANARAHALLI ANUGONDANAHALLI HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI POST, HOSAKOTE TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-560 067. 8. LOHIT.C.REDDY S/O M.CHANDRAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO. 2491, 17TH MAIN, HAL 2ND STAGE, INDIRANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 008. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.S.CHENNAKESHAVA., ADVOCATE FOR R8; R4-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED; NOTICE TO R5(A, D & E), R6 & R7-HELD SUFFICIENT V/O DATED: 18.04.2023; NOTICE TO R2 (A & B) & R3-HELD SUFFICIENT V/O DATED: 18.01.2024) THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19680 RFA No. 1816 of 2017 ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the appellant is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 24.01.2025, on that day, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant, either personally or through video conferencing. The appeal is listed today. As could be seen from the appeal papers, the appeal is filed in 2017. Now we are in the month of June 2025. It's almost eight years. As already noted above, when the case is called, the appellant is not represented. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12