APHC010502352003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 12172/2003 Between: 1. ALLA SIVA NAGA MAHALAKSHMI NAIDU, S/O. PEDA APPA RAO, JUNIOR ASSISTANT (UNDER SUSPENSION), SRI SANTHOSIMATHA AMMAVARI GROUP TEMPLE, ANAKAPALLI, ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI SANTHOSIMATHA AMMA GROUP TEMPLE, SRI SANTHOSIMATHA AMMAVARI GROUP TEMPLE, ANAKAPALLI, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. FOUNDER TRUSTEE, SRI SANTHOSIMATHA AMMAVARI GROUP TEMPLE, ANAKAPALLI, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT AS PER THE COURT ORDER DATED 18.08.2010 CASE AGAINST R2 IS DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, BOGGULAKUNTA, TILAK ROAD, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue, a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate Writ, declaring the action of the respondent No.1 in keeping me under suspension without paying the subsistance allowance and without any power and not reinstating petitioner even after 6 months from the date of suspension, and not conducting any enquiry for the last 2 years as illegal, void and against top the Part-III of the Constitution of India and consequentially direct the 1st respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service immediately by following the Rule 6 of the Office Hoders and Servants Punishments Rules, 1987 by paying the entire subsistance allowance and arrears of salary to the petitioner forthwith and IA NO: 1 OF 2003(WPMP 15134 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to pay the arrears of subsistance allowance from the date of suspension pending disposal of the above Writ Petition. IA NO: 1 OF 2004(WPMP 8993 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service immediately as no sanction was obtained by the 2nd respondent fro placing the petitioner under suspension for more than 6 months IA NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP 23044 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st respondent to release the arrears of salary and increments for the period 1.7.2001 to 31.4.2005 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N GURU GOPAL Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. N INDRANI 2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following order: It is brought to the notice of this Court that, as the petitioner’s counsel died, this court ordered notice to the sole petitioner. The endorsement of the Registry shows that the notices sent were returned with endorsement ‘No such person’. It shows that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting the matter. Since the matter is of the year 2003 and the petitioner is having no interest in prosecuting the matter, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed for non-prosecution. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. If at the petitioner feels that the cause in the writ petition still survives, he/she shall move appropriate application within two(02) months. No costs. Miscellaneous applications pending if any shall stand closed. ______________________ RAVI CHEEMALAPATI, J BRS