IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Ex. Pet (T) No.181 of 2024 Decided on: 03.11.2025 _________________________________________________________________ Nisha Sharma ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Anr …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Paras Dhaulta, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General for respondent No.1. Mr. C.N.Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge On account of pendency of Special Leave Petition against the judgment sought to be executed, at the request of learned counsel for the respondents, the hearings in this execution petition have been deferred from time to time. Learned counsel for the parties have jointly informed that the judgment sought to be enforced in this execution petition is still operative and has not been stayed by the Hon’ble Apex 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes - 2 - Court in the Special Leave Petitions preferred against them. Considering that judgment sought to be executed is still in operation, accordingly, this execution petition is disposed of with directions to the respondents to implement the decision within three weeks, however, this shall abide by the orders passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the Special Leave Petitions preferred against the judgment. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge November 03, 2025 R.Atal