ASHOK KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CRM-M/14338/2025 · 2025-03-26
Sudeepti Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33448 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33448 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-14338
132
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Ashok Kumar and anr. State of Haryana and ors.
CORAM : HON’BLE
Present: Mr.
***
SUDEEPTI SHARMA
1.
The present petition has been filed under Section Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) 07.12.2023 and FIR No. 434 dated 10.07.2023 registered under Sections 506/509/34 (Section 180 of IPC added lateron) District Rohtak, Haryana and all other subsequent proceedings arising out it against the petitioner
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner been falsely implicated fabricated story. No offence has been made out against the petitioner evidence on record to prove direct involvement of petitioner case. Learned counsel furthe Rashi and have
3.
I have heard learned counsel records of the case.
14338-2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM Date of Decision : Ashok Kumar and anr.
VERSUS State of Haryana and ors.
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Mr. Gaurav Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. *** SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J. (Oral)
The present petition has been filed under Section Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) 2023 for 07.12.2023 and FIR No. 434 dated 10.07.2023 registered under Sections 506/509/34 (Section 180 of IPC added lateron) District Rohtak, Haryana and all other subsequent proceedings arising out it against the petitioners in the present case.
Learned counsel for the petitioners been falsely implicated in the above case and the present case is based on false and fabricated story. No offence has been made out against the petitioner evidence on record to prove direct involvement of petitioner
Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner a child. He was having affair with the daughter of the complainant I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the records of the case. -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-14338-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 26.03.2025
....Petitioners
....Respondents SUDEEPTI SHARMA , Advocate for the petitioner. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya for quashing the charge sheet dated 07.12.2023 and FIR No. 434 dated 10.07.2023 registered under Sections 506/509/34 (Section 180 of IPC added lateron) at Police Station, Shivaji Colony, District Rohtak, Haryana and all other subsequent proceedings arising out it s contends that the petitioners ha in the above case and the present case is based on false and fabricated story. No offence has been made out against the petitioners. There is no evidence on record to prove direct involvement of petitioner No. 2 in the present hat the petitioner No. 2 is now married e was having affair with the daughter of the complainant for the petitioner and perused the whole
Bharatiya charge sheet dated 07.12.2023 and FIR No. 434 dated 10.07.2023 registered under Sections at Police Station, Shivaji Colony, District Rohtak, Haryana and all other subsequent proceedings arising out it have in the above case and the present case is based on false and . There is no in the present married to e was having affair with the daughter of the complainant. whole Gaurav Arora 2025.04.02 15:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-14338
4. A perusal of the record shows that in the present case, challan has already been presented and in the FIR, there are serious allegations against the present petitioner. 5. In view of the above, this Court charge sheet dated 07.12.2023 and FIR No. 434 dated 10.07.2023 registered under Sections 506/509/34 (Section 180 of IPC added lateron) at Police Station, Shivaji Colony, District Rohtak, Haryana and all other subsequent proceedings arising out it against the petitioner
6. The petition
7. Pending application
March 26, 2025 Gaurav Arora
Whether speaking/non
Whether reportable 14338-2025 (O&M) A perusal of the record shows that in the present case, challan has already been presented and in the FIR, there are serious allegations against the present petitioner.
In view of the above, this Court do not find any ground to quash the dated 07.12.2023 and FIR No. 434 dated 10.07.2023 registered under Sections 506/509/34 (Section 180 of IPC added lateron) at Police Station, Shivaji Colony, District Rohtak, Haryana and all other subsequent proceedings arising out it against the petitioners in the present case. The petition, being devoid of any merit, Pending application (s), if any, also stand disposed of. , 2025
(SUDEEPTI SHARMA)
Whether speaking/non-speaking : Speaking Whether reportable
: Yes/No
-2- A perusal of the record shows that in the present case, challan has already been presented and in the FIR, there are serious allegations against the do not find any ground to quash the dated 07.12.2023 and FIR No. 434 dated 10.07.2023 registered under Sections 506/509/34 (Section 180 of IPC added lateron) at Police Station, Shivaji Colony, District Rohtak, Haryana and all other subsequent proceedings arising out , being devoid of any merit, is dismissed. , if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDEEPTI SHARMA)
JUDGE speaking : Speaking : Yes/No
A perusal of the record shows that in the present case, challan has already been presented and in the FIR, there are serious allegations against the do not find any ground to quash the dated 07.12.2023 and FIR No. 434 dated 10.07.2023 registered under Sections 506/509/34 (Section 180 of IPC added lateron) at Police Station, Shivaji Colony, District Rohtak, Haryana and all other subsequent proceedings arising out Gaurav Arora 2025.04.02 15:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document