1 2025:CGHC:35124 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7292 of 2025 1 - Smt. Aparna Tripathi S/o Virendra Tripathi, Aged About 42 Years Presently Posted As Lecturer (Biology), At Govt. Higher Secondary School Mohadi, Block Dharsiwa, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director, Directorate Public Instruction, First Floor, C-Block, Indravati Bha- van, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - The Divisional Joint Director, Education Division, Raipur District Raipur Chhattis- garh 4 - The District Education Officer, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 5 - The Block Education Officer, Block Dharsiwa, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 6 - Smt. Sushila Tirkey, Presently Posted As Lecturer (Biology) At Govt. Higher Sec- ondary School Mohadi. Block Dharsiwa, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 7 - Shri Nagendra Kumar Diwan, Presently Posted As Lecturer (Biology) At Govt. Higher Secondary School Parsuli, Block Bagbahara, District Mahasamund Chhattis- garh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner (s) : Shri Sandeep Dubey, Advocate. For State : Shri SP Kale, Addl. Advocate General. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 22.07. 202 5 1. This is second round of litigation. In the earlier round of litigation the writ petition filed by the petitioner against his/her transfer order after declaring surplus Teacher under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions, was disposed of on 19.06.2025 with liberty to move fresh representation, if already not made, and in turn the District/Divisional 2 Rationalization Committee was directed to decide the same within specific time period. Now this petition has been filed after rejection of representation filed by the petitioner. 2. The counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Director, Public Instruction vide notification dated 08.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 08.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 08.07.2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue his/her representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 08.07.2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge inder