SUNITA KUMARI AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
CWP/15816/2025 · 2025-10-07
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33446 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33446 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.15816 of 2025
Decided on: 07.10.2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sunita Kumari and Anr
…..Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. and others
.....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Abhimanyu Rathore, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. L.N.Sharma, Additional Advocate General.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Mr. L.N.Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2.
With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage.
3.
Petitioners’ grievance is that their representations dated 15.09.2025 (Annexure P-11 Colly.) seeking applicability of Vikas Kumar Vs. State of H.P. &
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
2 Ors.2 have not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer.
4.
Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment in the case of Vikas Kumar2 within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioners.
The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua October 7, 2025
Judge R.Atal
2 CWP No.8032 of 2021 decided alongwith connected matters on 23.06.2025.