[2025:RJ-JP:35717] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14696/2024 Sajid @ Rahul S/o Kallu, R/o Village Bas Karmuka, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg, District Bharatpur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pallav Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Khushwant for Mr. Ankit Khandelwal Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 26/08/2025 1. Instant application for bail is filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicant-accused Sajid @ Rahul S/o Kallu in FIR No. 620/2023 dated 10.10.2023 registered at P.S. Kaman, District -Deeg, whereby the applicant-accused was charged under Sections 323, 341, 302, 307, 452 and 34 of IPC. 2. The applicant was arrested and is in judicial custody since his arrest. The Court below has dismissed the bail application. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicant is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. Further, submits that the investigation relating to present applicant- accused is complete and is no more required by the Investigating Agency for investigation. He also submits that [2025:RJ-JP:35717] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-14696/2024] the trial will take its own time and no purpose will be served by keeping the applicant-accused in custody. 4. Learned counsel for applicant submits that applicant-accused is in custody since his arrest and Trial Court has dismissed the bail application only on the ground that applicant- accused has criminal antecedents. He further submits that there is no evidence to show that applicant-accused has fired gunshot upon injured deceased and as a result of deadly assault, the deceased has expired. He further submits that the material on record is not sufficient to deny bail to applicant-accused. 5. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for complainant. 6. Heard learned counsels for the parties and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record. 7. On basis of report dated 10.10.2023 lodged by complainant Juhru for assault upon Aamir by Sajid (present applicant) and further injury from firearms upon his daughter Maeesa, the case is registered. During investigation, Aamir has expired and a charge-sheet has been filed against applicant- accused under Sections 323, 341, 452, 307 and 302 of IPC. 8. The applicant is named in FIR and allegation of deadly assault is upon applicant-accused. Beside above, 8 criminal cases were registered against applicant-accused since 2013 onwards, the applicant-accused has used firearms in assaulting deceased Aamir. [2025:RJ-JP:35717] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-14696/2024] 9. Having considered the material available on record, the case is of serious and heinous nature, therefore, applicant- accused is not entitled to be released on baill. 10. In view of discussion made hereinabove, the instant bail application preferred by applicant-accused Sajid @ Rahul S/o Kallu under Section 483 of BNSS, is hereby dismissed. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /32