Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33442 (RAJ)

SONU @ SUNIL S/O SHRI HETSINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/14660/2024 · 2025-03-27

Anil Kumar Upman

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:14170] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14660/2024 Sonu @ Sunil S/o Shri Hetsingh, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Bhawanpura, Police Thana Rudawal District Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through The Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gordhan Singh Fauzdar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shriram Dhakad, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 27/03/2025 1. The instant pre-arrest bail application has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who is having apprehension of his arrest in connection with FIR No.372/2023 registered at Police Station Rudawal, District Bharatpur for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406 & 506 of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. It is submitted that petitioner has joined the investigation in terms of order dated 05.02.2025. Counsel further submits that custodial interrogation of petitioner is not required in this matter. 3. Learned State Counsel opposes the bail application, however, learned State Counsel fairly concedes that as per investigation report, petitioner has joined the investigation. [2025:RJ-JP:14170] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14660/2024] 4. Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, especially the fact that petitioner has joined the investigation in terms of order dated 05.02.2025, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to allow this anticipatory bail application. 5. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Rudawal, District Bharatpur in FIR No.372/2023 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner – Sonu @ Sunil S/o Shri Hetsingh, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /313