Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33440 (RAJ)

LALLU RAM S/O LATE SHRI GANGU AND GANGARAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

WRW/266/2019 · 2025-08-20

Sameer Jain

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:32805] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Review Petition (Writ) No. 266/2019 1. Lallu Ram S/o Late Shri Gangu And Gangaram, Aged About 63 Years, R/o Village Rajpura, Patalwas, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur 2. Shankar Lal S/o Late Shri Gangu And Gangaram, R/o Village Rajpura, Patalwas, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur. 3. Bhagirath S/o Late Shri Gangu And Gangaram, R/o Village Rajpura, Patalwas, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur. 4. Kaluram S/o Shri Ram Kishore, R/o Village Rajpura, Patalwas, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur. 5. Jagdish S/o Shri Ladu, R/o Village Rajpura, Patalwas, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur. 6. Laxman S/o Shri Ladu, R/o Village Rajpura, Patalwas, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur. 7. Babu S/o Shri Ladu, R/o Village Rajpura, Patalwas, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur. 8. Ram Kishan S/o Late Shri Nehnu Ram, R/o Village Rajpura, Patalwas, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The District Collector, Jaipur 2. Sub-Divisional Officer, Bassi, District Jaipur. 3. Panchayat Samiti Bassi, District Jaipur, Through Village Development Officer. 4. Gram Panchayat, Rajpura Patalwas, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur Through Its Secretary 5. Ramrai S/o Ramsahai, Aged About 75 Years, R/o Village Rajpura Patalwas, Teja Baba Ki Dhani, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur 6. Radheyshyam S/o Ramdhan, Aged About 68 Years, R/o Village Rajpura Patalwas, Teja Baba Ki Dhani, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur 7. Devi Lal @ Devnarayan S/o Ramdhan, Aged About 63 Years, R/o Village Rajpura Patalwas, Teja Baba Ki Dhani, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur ----Respondents [2025:RJ-JP:32805] (2 of 2) [WRW-266/2019] For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 20/08/2025 When the matter is called, no one has marked presence on behalf of the petitioner. Present matter pertains to the review of the order dated 17.01.2017. Upon perusal of the case file, it is noted that review petition is filed with a considerable delay of 994 days. In light of the foregoing facts and circumstances, present review petition is dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /62