Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3344 (UTT)

TEJRAM v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

CRJA/29/2020 · 2025-09-03

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS CRJA No.29 of 2020 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Karan Anand, learned Amicus Curiae for the appellant. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned AGA along with Ms. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. This criminal jail appeal has been preferred by the appellant through Senior Superintendent, Sub-District, Jail, Haldwani, District Nainital against the judgment and order dated 10.02.2020, passed by learned District and Sessions Judge, Nainital in S.T. No.42 of 2019, State vs. Tejram, whereby the appellant has been convicted under Section 326 IPC and sentenced to undergo five years’ R.I. with fine of Rs.10,000/- with default stipulation of four months’ imprisonment. 4. Appellant was under incarceration. 5. Learned State Counsel supplied instructions dated 07.04.2024 to the Court, which have been taken on record. On instructions, he submits that the appellant was given special remission for premature release vide Government Order No.26/XX-2/2023-1(17)/2022 dated 11.01.2023 and was accordingly released from jail on 26.01.2023. 6. In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, nothing survives in the present criminal jail appeal. 7. Accordingly, the present criminal jail appeal is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 03.09.2025 AK