SYED BABA SAHEB @ BASHA SAHEB v. STATE OF AP., REP BY ITS P.P AND ANOTHERS
CRLRC/672/2014 · 2025-06-29
Y Lakshmana Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33437 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33437 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010501842014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MONDAY.THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 672 OF 2014 Revision filed under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C, 1973 dt. 12.02.2014 passed in CrI. M.P No. 760 of 2013 in C.C.No.44 of 2013 on the file of the court of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Railway Kodur. Between: Syed Baba Saheb @ Basha Saheb, S/o Khadar Sab Ram Nagar, Kodur Town and Mandal, Kadapa District. against Order aged 69 years, R/o ...Petitioner/Accused AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Public Prosecutor of Andhra Pradesh Amaravathi. 2. Tahsildar, Railway Kodur Mandal, Kadapa District. High Court ...Respondents LA NO: 1 OF 2014(CRLRCMP 1081 OF 2014 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to order stay of all further proceedings including petitioner in C.C.No. 44 of 2013 on the file of the court of Learned Judicial appearance of the
%% Magistrate of First Class, Railway Kodur, pending disposal of the main Criminal Revision Case. /, Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following:
% APHC010501842014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) K [3521] MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 672/2014 Between;
SYED BABA SAHEB @ BASHA SAHEB, S/0 KHADAR SAB, R/0 RAM NAGAR, KODUR TOWN AND MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF AP REP BY ITS P P AND ANOTHERS, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURTOF AP HYDERABAD. 2.TAHSILDAR, RAILWAY KODUR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): I Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S);
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(AP) The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. The Criminal Revision Case has been filed challenging the order of
2. dismissal of the discharge petition filed in Crl.M.P.No.760 of 2013 in C.C.
2 Dr.YLRJ Crl.R.C.No.672 of 2aU Dated 30.06.2025 No.44 of 2013 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class Railway Kodur. 3. It is submitted that the main case, i.e., C.C. No.44 of 2013, was ended in acquittal on 12.02.2016.
In view of the disposal of the main case itself, nothing remains in this Criminal Revision Case for further adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. Sd/- M RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, The Magistrate of First Class, Railway Kodur (with One CC to Sri. Nimmagadda Satyanarayana, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. Two CD Copies
1. records)
2. 3. [OUT]
4. 5. PR sree
HIGH COURT DATED:30/06/2025 ORDER CRLRC No.672 of 2014 ^ 2 5 SEP 2025 rrentSecti * DISMISSING THE CRLRC AS INFRUCTUOUS