Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33435 (JHR)

UJJWAL KUMAR SAHU ALIAS UJJAL KUMAR SAHU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./4090/2024 · 2025-10-13

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:31483 --1-- A.B.A. No. 4090 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4090 of 2024 ---- Ujjwal Kumar Sahu @ Ujjal Kumar Sahu, aged about 34 years, son of Jyoti Nryan Sahu, resident of Arki Purana Nagar, PO and PS – Arki, District – Khunti, Jharkhand .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Raj Nandan Chatterjee, Advocate For the State :- Mrs. Amrita Kumari, Advocate ---- 07/13.10.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Ichagarh P.S. Case No.66 of 2022, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 419, 420, 504 and 506 of Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of learned A.C.J.M., Chandil. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he has prepared a supplementary affidavit suo motu on behalf of the petitioner wherein the undertaking has been given that the petitioner will return the rest of the amount to the informant. 4. In view of his such submission, the said affidavit is taken on record. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegations are made that the informant has paid a sum of Rs.1,91,000/- upon the petitioner. He further submits that, subsequently, the promise has not been fulfilled and in view of that the petitioner has already 2025:JHHC:31483 --2-- A.B.A. No. 4090 of 2024 returned a sum of Rs.89,000/- and to buttress this argument he refers to annexure-2 which is the transaction with regard to the amount in the account of Sudhir Mahto and Manoj Kumar Mahto. He then submits that the petitioner is also willing to return the rest of the amount. 6. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the allegations are there against the petitioner of taking of amount on the false pretext of providing the job. 7. In view of the above and considering that the petitioner has already paid a sum of Rs.89,000/- and annexure-2 substantiate the said argument and he is also willing to return the rest of the amount and further the affidavit to that effect has been filed suo motu on behalf of the petitioner that he will return the rest of the amount, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 8. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of his surrender/arrest, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Chandil in connection with Ichagarh P.S. Case No.66 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 13.10.2025 Sangam/