2025:JHHC:31769 --1-- A.B.A. No. 5206 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 5206 of 2025 ---- 1. Gorishankar Prasad @ Gauri Shankar Prasad, S/o Late Nageshwar Mahto, aged about 46 years 2. Prasant Kumar @ Prashant Kumar, S/o Gauri Shankar Prasad, aged about 19 years 3. Kiran Devi, W/o – Gauri Shankar Prasad, aged about 41 years All are resident of village – Jharpo, PO and PS – Tatijhariya, District – Hazaribag, Jharkhand 825313 .... Petitioners -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate :- Mr. Rajendra Ram Ravidas, Advocate :- Mr. Abhinav Raj, Advocate :- Mr. Ashutosh Kr. Sinha, Advocate For the State :- Mrs. Kumari Rashmi, Advocate ---- 04/14.10.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Tatijharia P.S. Case No.16 of 2025, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 303(2), 74 and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the Court of learned J.M.F.C., Hazaribag. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and there are land dispute between the parties. He further submits that the petitioners and the informant’s sides are family members and the altercation took place when the motorcycle was being turned by the informant on the land of 2025:JHHC:31769 --2-- A.B.A. No. 5206 of 2025 the informant. On this background, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be provided to the petitioners. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that pursuant to the earlier order the case diary has been received and the materials are there and the witnesses have supported the case of the prosecution. 5. Looking into the contents of the FIR, it transpires that there is serious allegation against the petitioners of outraging the modesty and the allegation of assault is also there and grievous injury has also been found. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is hereby rejected. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 14.10.2025 Sangam/