Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33428 (RAJ)

RAJKUMAR S/O RAJVEER @ AAUTAR SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/14664/2024 · 2025-03-12

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:11594] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14664/2024 Rajkumar S/o Rajveer @ Aautar Singh, R/o Jhumkrai Ka Pura Police Station Fatehabad, District Agra. (At Present In District Jail, Dholpur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil Jain, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 12/03/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.233/2010 registered at Police Station Mania, District Dholpur (Raj.) for the offences punishable under Sections 341 and 392 of IPC. Later on, Police filed charge-sheet in this matter. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that other co-accused persons have already been granted bail by co-ordinate Benches of this Court. He argues that charge-sheet has already been filed, there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. He contends that the [2025:RJ-JP:11594] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14664/2024] petitioner is in custody since 03.11.2024 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially the fact that other co-accused persons have already been granted bail by co-ordinate Benches of this Court; charge-sheet has been filed; absence of criminal antecedents; trial will take time in its conclusion and looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Rajkumar S/o Rajveer @ Aautar Singh, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/154