Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33420 (RAJ)

UMESH CHAND SHARMA S/O SHRI PANNA LAL SHARMA v. SHRI ASHUTOSH A.T. PADNEKAR

CCP/1129/2024 · 2025-08-21

Ganesh Ram Meena

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:33005] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1129/2024 1. Umesh Chand Sharma S/o Shri Panna Lal Sharma, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Jhareda Road, New Colony, Hindaun City, Distt. Karauli (Raj.). 2. Ramcharan Saini S/o Shri Genda Ram, Aged About 64 Years, R/o Dataterya Colony, Jhareda Road Hindaun City, Distt. Karauli (Raj.). 3. Bhagwati Prasad Sharma S/o Shri Amarnath Sharma, Aged About 63 Years, R/o Village And Post Jagar, Tehsil Suroth, Distt. Karauli (Raj.). 4. Yashwant Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Prasadi Lal Sharma, Aged About 62 Years, R/o Chobepada, Kumbaj Bhawan, Hindaun City, Distt. Karauli (Raj.). ----Petitioners Versus 1. Shri Ashutosh A.t. Padnekar, Principal Secretary To Government, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj. Department, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. Shri Ravi Jain, Commissioner Cum Secretary To Govt. Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 3. Shri Uday Bhanu Charan, Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Karauli (Raj.). 4. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Government Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG, with Mr. Ashutosh Udawat Ms. Anjali Ranga Mr. Anshul Ranga HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 21/08/2025 The Court passed the order dated 04.01.2024 allowing the petitioner to make a representation to the respondents in light of [2025:RJ-JP:33005] (2 of 2) [CCP-1129/2024] the order passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18941/2018 (Gulam Rasool Bisayati Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr.) and the respondents were directed to decide the representation in accordance with law. Learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondents submits that against the judgment in the case of Gulam Rasool Bisayati (supra) the State has preferred D.B. Special Appeal No. 1068/2022 which is still pending for disposal. He further submits that the benefits would also be extended to the petitioner as per the disposal of the appeal in the case of Gulam Rasool Bisayati (supra). In view of the statement made by the learned AAG, the present contempt petition is disposed of at this stage. The petitioner would be at liberty to file fresh contempt petition after disposal of D.B. Special Appeal No. 1068/2022 in case any benefit as per the orders of the Division Bench are not extended to the petitioner. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /16