[2025:RJ-JP:33092] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 3095/2024 Jaggo @ Jagmohan Son Of Badri, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Math Mallpura Police Station Sarmathura District Dholpur Rajasthan (Presently In District Jail Dholpur Rajasthan) ----Appellant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor 2. Shankarlal S/o Rambhajan, Resident Of Reechra Sarmathura District Dholpur ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 2774/2024 1. Hansram S/o Nirbhay, Resident Of Math Mallpura Police Station Sarmathura District Dholpur (Accused Are Presently Confined In District Jail, Dholpur) 2. Lal Singh S/o Khooba @ Khoob Chand, Resident Of Math Mallpura Police Station Sarmathpura District Dholpur (Accused Are Presently Confined In District Jail, Dholpur) ----Appellants Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor 2. Shankar Lal S/o Rambhajan, Resident Of Reechhara Sarmathura District Dholpur ----Respondents S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 3015/2024 Loke@ Lokendra S/o Shrichand, R/o Math Mallpura Police Station Sarmathura Dsitrict Dholpur (Accused Petitioner In Judicial Custody In District Jail Dholpur) ----Appellant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. Shankarlal S/o Rambhajan, R/o Richra Sarmathura District Dholpur ----Respondents [2025:RJ-JP:33092] (2 of 3) [CRLAS-3095/2024] For Appellant(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh with Mr. Shivam Sharma Mr. Manoj Awasthi with Ms. Shashi Sharma Mr. Sumit Kumar Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Dushyant Jain Mr. Udit Sapra Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 21/08/2025 1. These appeals were preferred by applicant-accused Jaggo @ Jagmohan, Hansram, Lal Singh and Loke@ Lokendra in a matter arising out of FIR No. 155/2024 P.S. Sarmathura District Dholpur. 2. During course of argument, learned counsels for appellants submits that the matter is fixed at the stage of recording evidence for prosecution and one of the material witness has already been examined but still two more material witnesses are remaining. They further submits that a liberty be granted to them to file bail appeal after recording statement of Prem Singh S/o Sh. Shanker Lal, Shanker Lal S/o Ram Bhajan and Rati Ram S/o Shanker Lal, if not examined so far. 3. Having considered the submission of learned counsels for the parties and learned Public Prosecutor these criminal appeals are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. 4. The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and record the statement of Prem Singh S/o Sh. Shanker Lal, Shanker Lal S/o Ram Bhajan and Rati Ram S/o Shanker Lal on priority basis preferably within a period of 3 months from date of receipt of copy of this order. [2025:RJ-JP:33092] (3 of 3) [CRLAS-3095/2024] 5. Learned counsel for complainant is also directed to ensure that these witnesses remain present before the Trial Court if they are not recorded so far on date fixed by the Trial Court. 6. All appeals stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /257-259