[2025:RJ-JP:12238] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14706/2024 Arbaz @ Loni S/o Late Ahmed Khan, R/o House No. 340, Nagpal Basti Soorsagar Bombay Yojna, Kota Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abdul Kalam Khan, Mr. Sanjay Gurjar and Ms. Faziya G. Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Poonia, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 18/03/2025 1. Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No. 333/2024 registered at Police Station Nayapura, District Kota City for the offence(s) under Section 309(4) of BNS, the accused-petitioner has preferred this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that the accused-petitioner is ready and willing to cooperate with the investigation and custodial investigation of the accused-petitioner is not required, therefore, anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail application and submitted the factual report. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. [2025:RJ-JP:12238] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14706/2024] 5. It is alleged against the accused-petitioner that on 11.07.2024 at 09:30 am, he along with the other co-accused committed robbery and forcefully fled away with a Activa bearing No. RJ 20 KS 8274 along with Rs.15,350/-. The incident was captured in the CCTV camera. The other co-accused was arrested on the basis of footage captured in the CCTV and he in his disclosure statement named the accused-petitioner in committing the said offence. The factual report also shows that the accused- petitioner is a habitual offender and against him offences under Sections 302, 392, 365 and 379 of IPC and Section 4/25 of Arms Act are pending, therefore, considering the above facts, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application of the accused- petitioner is hereby, dismissed. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/145