1 2025:CGHC:31513 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 3497 of 2025 Nivedita Singh D/o Shri Chhatrapal Singh Aged About 45 Years R/o D-8 Saket Enclave Near Samarth Nursing Hospital Mungeli Road Bilaspur Tehsil And District - Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Union Of India Through Secretary, Ministry Of Road Transport And Highways Marg Area New Delhi District - New Delhi Delhi 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Raipur District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Chief Engineer Public Work Department National Highway Region Raipur District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - Collector Bilaspur District- Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 5 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Cum Land Acquisition Officer Kota, District - Bilaspur (C.G.). ---- Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : Ms. Palak Jindal, Advocate. For Respondent-State : Mr. Soumitra Kesharwani, PL For Respondent -UIO : Mr. Niraj Baghel & Ms. Anmol Sharma, Advocates on behalf of Mr. Ramakant Mishra, Dy. SG.. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 09.07.2025 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition with following reliefs: 2 “10.1 That, this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent to decide the representation within time frame of 2 months in accordance with law. (ANNEXURE P/1). 10.2 Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper, may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to the respondents-authorities concerned to consider and decide the pending representations of the petitioner Annexures P-1, P-4, P-5, at the earliest within specified time. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submit that they are having no objection to the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 5. Considering facts of the case, submission of counsel for the respective parties, writ petition is disposed of directing the concerned respondents- authorities to consider and decide the pending representations of the petitioner in accordance with law, preferably, within an outer limit of ‘3 months’ from the date of receipt of copy of this order. CC as per rules. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge J/-