Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33398 (MAD)

SHALINI v. STATE REPRESENTED BY,

CRL OP/6546/2025 · 2025-03-07

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No. 6546 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07.03.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No. 6546 of 2025 1. Shalini 2. R.Lokesh ..... petitioners Vs 1. State Represented By, The Inspector of Police, Crime Branch, Selaiyur Police Station, Chennai - 600 073. 2. Lurdusamy ..... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to direct the first respondent police not to harass the petitioners in pursuant to the complaint made by the second respondent under the guise of enquiry. For petitioners : Mr. M.Rajagopalakrishnan For Respondents : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan Government Advocate (Crl.Side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No. 6546 of 2025 O R D E R This petition has been filed seeking direction to the first respondent police not to harass the petitioners under the guise of enquiry. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the first respondent police harassed the petitioners under the guise of enquiry. 3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the first respondent police submits that on the complaint given by the defacto complainant against the petitioners, petition enquiry is pending. 4. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials placed on record. 5. It is the grievance of the petitioners that the first and second respondent police have been harassing him under the guise of an enquiry/investigation and hence, has invoked the inherent powers of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Page 2 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No. 6546 of 2025 6. An enquiry into a non cognizable offence or a cognizable offence is the unfettered powers of the Investigation Officers so long as the power to investigate/enquiry into these offences are legitimately exercised within the frame work of Chapter XIII of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Though the Sanhita empowers the Magistrate to be a guardian in all the stages of the police investigation, there is no power envisaging him to interfere with the actual investigation or the mode of investigation. It is in this background that numerous petitions complaining of harassment are being reported and filed before this Court seeking for directions to refrain the police officials from harassing the persons named in a complaint. 7. This Court, exercising its power under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, normally would not interfere with the investigation conducted by a police officer. Nevertheless, it would also not turn a blind eye to instances of harassment by the police under the guise of investigation is brought to its notice. 8. In the present case in hand, the petitioners has complained of harassment by the police based on a complaint and seek for this https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No. 6546 of 2025 Court's intervention by way of a direction. The term 'harassment' by itself has a very wide meaning and hence, what could be harassment to the petitionerss may not be the same to the police officer. 9. In order to circumvent such situations, the following guidelines are issued: a) While summoning any person named in the complaint or any witness to the incident complained of, the police officer shall summon such person through a written summon under Section 179 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, specifying a particular date and time for appearing before them for such an enquiry/investigation. b)The minutes of the enquiry shall be recorded in the general diary/station diary/daily diary of the police station. c)The police officer shall refrain himself or herself from harassing persons called upon for enquiry/investigation. d)The guidelines stipulated for preliminary enquiry or registration of FIR by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others [2014 (2) SCC (1)] shall be strictly adhered to. Page 4 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No. 6546 of 2025 10. With the above observations and direction, the Criminal Original Petition stands disposed off. 07.03.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order Lpp To 1. The Inspector of Police, Crime Branch, Selaiyur Police Station, Chennai - 600 073. 2. . The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. Page 5 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No. 6546 of 2025 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. Lpp Crl.O.P.No. 6546 of 2025 07.03.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis