Mura Rathnakumari, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/25700/2025 · 2025-09-18
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33394 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33394 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010501752025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No. 25700 of 2025 Between:
1. MURA RATHNAKUMARI,, W/O.POUL REDDY, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE,
R/O.TERNAMPALLI VILLAGE, LINGALA MANDAL YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, YSR DISTRICT, KADAPA.
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, JAMMALAMADUGU REVENUE DIVISION, JAMMALAMADUGU, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
4. THE TAHSILDAR, KONDAPURARN MANDAL YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. .
5. KOTA SUBADRAMMA, W/O.CHINNA RAMI REDDY, R/O.SANKEPALLI VILLAGE, KONDAPURAM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the respondent No.3 in disposing the Appeal Case No.1200/2021 on filed by me against the respondent No.5 in connection with the land in an extent of Ac. 1.14 Cents in Sy.No.158/6 under Section 5(5) of the A.P.Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Book Act, 1971 even after lapse of four years as illegal. arbitrary, abdication of statutory duty caste on
2
him, apart from being fundamental rights guaranteed to me under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.3 to dispose/pass orders in Appeal Case No. 1200/2021 filed by me against the respondent No.5.
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P V N KIRAN KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following:
3
ORDER:
The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:
“…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the respondent No.3 in disposing the Appeal Case No.1200/2021 on filed by me against the respondent No.5 in connection with the land in an extent of Ac.1.14 Cents in Sy.No.158/6 under Section 5(5) of the A.P.Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Book Act, 1971 even after lapse of four years as illegal, arbitrary, abdication of statutory duty caste on him, apart from being fundamental rights guaranteed to me under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.3 to dispose/pass orders in Appeal Case No.1200/2021 filed by me against the respondent No.5 and pass such other order or orders…”
2. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for respondent Nos.1 to 4.
3. The petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for issuance of a direction for expeditious disposal of the appeal registered as Appeal Case No.1200/2021 pending before the 3rd respondent- Revenue Divisional Officer.
4.
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the appellate authority is bound to decide the case in accordance with the law expeditiously.
4
5. Ergo, this Court is inclined to direct the 3rd respondent-appellate authority to make an endeavor, or to put to an end, by making all the efforts, in deciding the case with due diligence within a reasonable time for disposal of the appeal on merits and as per law, after hearing all the parties to the dispute, as expeditiously as possible, and, in any case, not beyond three (03) months from date of receipt of a copy this order.
6. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 19.09.2025
siva
5
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.25700 of 2025
Date: 19.09.2025
siva