SACHIN MANGLA v. CHANDER SHEKHAR KHARE CHEIF ADMINISTRATOR HSVP AND ANOTHER
COCP/1274/2025 · 2025-04-21
Harkesh Manuja
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33389 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33389 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
COCP No.1274 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 146
SACHIN MANGLA
Vs CHANDER SHEKHAR KHARE CHEIF ADMINISTRATOR HSVP AND ANOTHER
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ
Present: Mr.
Mr. H.S. Gill, Advocate and
Ms. Nihar Bala, Advocate
Mr. Amit Aggarwal, D.A.G., Haryana.
HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral)
1.
Separate short replies Rakesh Saini, Estate Officer and Ms. Anupma Malik, Land Acquisition Collector, Urban Estates, Gurugram on behalf of respondent No.2
2.
Learned instant case have been ordered to be stayed dated 17.04.2025 respondents releasing the amount awarded by the Reference Court along with an undertaking before the Contempt Court.
3.
In view of the above, the present petition at this stage.
4.
Disposed of aggrieved, he may move representation before the respondents within a period of two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and decided within f thereafter from the date of its receipt by way of passing a speaking order, which shall be communicated to the petitioner within a period of two weeks thereafter.
5.
Rule stands discharged.
April 21, 2025 Atik Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2025 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.1274 of 2025 (O&M)
Date of Decision:
SACHIN MANGLA
CHANDER SHEKHAR KHARE CHEIF ADMINISTRATOR HSVP AND
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.S. Gill, Advocate and Ms. Nihar Bala, Advocate for the respondents. Mr. Amit Aggarwal, D.A.G., Haryana.
**** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) Separate short replies-cum-status reports by way of affidavit Rakesh Saini, Estate Officer-1, HSVP, Gurugram on behalf of respondent No.1 and Ms. Anupma Malik, Land Acquisition Collector, Urban Estates, Gurugram on behalf of respondent No.2 have been filed in Court, the same are taken on record. Learned State counsel informs that the instant case have been ordered to be stayed by the Hon’ble Apex Court vide order 17.04.2025 passed in SLP(Civil) Dairy No(s). respondents releasing the amount awarded by the Reference Court along with an undertaking before the Contempt Court. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press esent petition at this stage.
Disposed of being not pressed, however, in case petitioner still feels aggrieved, he may move representation before the respondents within a period of two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and decided within f thereafter from the date of its receipt by way of passing a speaking order, which shall be communicated to the petitioner within a period of two weeks thereafter. Rule stands discharged.
(HARKESH MANUJA)
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1274 of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 21.04.2025
......Petitioner CHANDER SHEKHAR KHARE CHEIF ADMINISTRATOR HSVP AND
....Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA for the petitioner. for the respondents. Mr. Amit Aggarwal, D.A.G., Haryana.
status reports by way of affidavit(s) of Sh. 1, HSVP, Gurugram on behalf of respondent No.1 and Ms. Anupma Malik, Land Acquisition Collector, Urban Estates, Gurugram on have been filed in Court, the same are taken on record. counsel informs that the contempt proceedings in the by the Hon’ble Apex Court vide order passed in SLP(Civil) Dairy No(s).16448/2025 subject to respondents releasing the amount awarded by the Reference Court along with an
learned counsel for the petitioner does not press not pressed, however, in case petitioner still feels aggrieved, he may move representation before the respondents within a period of two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and decided within four weeks thereafter from the date of its receipt by way of passing a speaking order, which shall be communicated to the petitioner within a period of two weeks thereafter.
(HARKESH MANUJA)
JUDGE
1 of Sh. 1, HSVP, Gurugram on behalf of respondent No.1 and Ms. Anupma Malik, Land Acquisition Collector, Urban Estates, Gurugram on have been filed in Court, the same are taken on record. contempt proceedings in the by the Hon’ble Apex Court vide order subject to respondents releasing the amount awarded by the Reference Court along with an
learned counsel for the petitioner does not press not pressed, however, in case petitioner still feels aggrieved, he may move representation before the respondents within a period of our weeks thereafter from the date of its receipt by way of passing a speaking order, which
MOHMED ATIK 2025.04.22 18:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment