Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3338 (KAR)

SRI SRINIVAS v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/21328/2017 · 2025-02-06

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:2392 WP No. 21328 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO.21328 OF 2017 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: 1. SRI SRINIVAS S/O. HANUMANTHAPPA BELDONI, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT AMBEDKAR NAGAR, CHANPETH ROAD, OLD HUBBALLI, HUBBALLI - 580 020. 2. SRI MANJUNATH S/O. TAMANAPPA ADAKI, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT N ARAYANA SOFA, 2ND CROSS, OLD HUBBALLI, HUBBALLI - 580 020. 3. SRI SUBHAS S/O. CHANNAPPA HOSAMANI, R/AT AYODYA NAGAR, AMBEDKAR COLONY, 1ST CROSS, OLD HUBBALLI, HUBBALLI - 580 020. 4. SRI BASAVARAJ S/O. NAGAPPA HALLIKERI, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT AMBEDKAR NAGAR, CHANPETH ROAD, OLD HUBBALLI, HUBBALLI - 580 020. Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:2392 WP No. 21328 of 2017 5. SRI RAJU S/O. RAYAPPA HOSAMANI, AGED ABOUT 4O YEARS, R/AT NAVA AYODYA NAGAR, AMBEDKAR COLONY, OLD HUBBALLI, HUBLI - 580 020. 6. SRI JAYARAM G. GANAGAPPA S/O. GANAGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/AT AMBEDKAR NAGAR, CHANPETH ROAD, OLD HUBBALLI, HUBBALLI - 580 020. 7. SRI SHRINIVAS S/O. NALAMMA TAGARGUNTI, AGE: 46 YEARS, R/AT AMBEDKAR NAGAR, CHANPETH ROAD, OLD HUBBALLI, HUBBALLI - 580 020. 8. SRI YALLAPPA S/O. HONAPPA YARAGUNTI, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT INDIRA NAGAR, OLD HUBBALLI, HUBBALLI - 580 020. 9. SRI MANJUNATH S/O. MAVADEVI YARAMASAL, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/AT: KARKI BASAVESHWARA NAGAR, 5TH CROSS, HUBBALLI - 580 020. 10. SRI KRISHNA S/O. NAGAPPA RAMYYANAVAR, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT: KARKI BASAVESHWARA NAGAR, HUBBALLI - 580 020. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:2392 WP No. 21328 of 2017 11. SRI ANAND S/O. YAMANAPPA NAVALGUND, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT: 8TH CROSS, KARKI BASAVESHWARA NAGAR, HUBBALLI - 580 020. 12. SRI FAKIRAPPA S/O. SHIVAPPA INGALALLI, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT: 7TH CROSS, KARKI BASAVESHWARA NAGAR, HUBBALLI - 580 020. 13. SRI VIJAY KUMAR S/O. RAMACHANDRA GABBUR, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/AT: KARKI BASAVESHWARA NAGAR, OLD HUBBALLI, HUBBALLI - 580 020. 14. SRI SHIVANDA S/O. FAKIRAPPA NARANAPUR, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/AT: NAVA AYODYANAGAR, AMBEDKAR COLONY, OLD HUBBALLI, HUBBALLI - 580 020. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI J PRASHANTH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA,VIDHANA VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:2392 WP No. 21328 of 2017 DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, VISVESHWARAYYA TOWER PHODIUM BLOCK, VIDHANA VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001. 3. THE DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, VISVESHWARAYYA TOWER, PHODIUM BLOCK, VIDHANA VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001. 4. HUBBALLI - DHARWAD CITY CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, HUBBALLI - DHARWAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION HUBBALLI - 580 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SHARAD V. MAGADUM, AGA FOR R1 TO R3; SRI GURUDEV GACHCHINAMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO, ISSUE WRIT OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE NOTIFICATION DATED 27.12.2016 BEARING NO.HDMC.74/2016-17 ISSUED BY R-4 VIDE ANNEX-A. ISSUE WRIT , ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE G.O. DATED 30.11.2016 BEARING NO. NA.AA.EE.29 SFC 2016M BANGALORE ISSUED BY R-1 VIDE ANNEX-B ISSUE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS TO NOT TO TERMINATE THE SERVICES OF THE PETITIONERS POURAKARMIKAS AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 5 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:2392 WP No. 21328 of 2017 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) The petition is preferred calling in question the tender notification dated 27.12.2016 and the consequential order dated 30.11.2016, eight years have passed by, the tender process has spent itself. In that light, the petition is disposed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE VNP/CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 113