1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2022 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No.8232 of 2017 (RCT) BETWEEN : THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY HUBLI. ...APPELLANT [BY SRI. ABHINAY Y T, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)] AND: 1 . SMT R VIJAYALAKSHMI W/O LATE R SOMASHEKAR, 38 YEARS 2 . KUM.R.NANDINI D/O LATE R.SOMASHEKAR, 20 YEARS 3 . KUM.R. SANDHYARANI D/O LATE R.SOMASHEKAR, 19 YEARS 4 . KUM.R.PUJITHA D/O LATE R.SOMASHEKAR, 12 YEARS MINOR, REPRESENTED BY HER MOTHER R.VIJAYLAKSHMI THE 1ST RESPONDENT 2 5 . SMT.R. GOVINDAMMA W/O LATE R.RAMAIAH CHETTY, 88 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT NO.1-383, RAMAKUPPAM, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-517 401. ….RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. TANVEER PASHA A S, ADVOCATE FOR C/R 1 TO 5) THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 23(1) OF RAILWAY CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ACT. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT There is no representation on behalf of appellant. The matter is listed today for orders regarding non-compliance of office objections raised on process memo - to furnish I.A.No.1/2017, 5 copies to issue notice to respondents. As could be seen from the appeal papers, the appeal is filed on 30.10.2017. 3 Now we are in the month of August 2022. Despite giving several opportunities, office objections are not complied with. As already noted above, there is no representation on behalf of appellant. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution and for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- JUDGE TKN